Friday, August 26, 2011
Self-Sabotage
Sunday, August 14, 2011
An Honest Seeker of Truth
It has come to my attention that there are few honest seekers of truth left. Watching shows like Bones, Psych, and House have really started to bug the crap out of me. Each one of them has a perfect belief and subsequently a perfect understanding of an incredible number of subjects. These subjects generally cover areas that the normal person in their position would have very little real knowledge of. For instance, who knows the chemical composition of a tire, most perfumes, accelerants, incense, and synthetic fibers? Apparently, Hodgens does. Who can be so perceptive to know that a single strand of hair on the mat on the driver’s side of a car would be pertinent to an investigation if the person is a slob? Shawn can, of course! Who would have come within an inch of their life, see the future, have psychic contact with several patients, and meet a man who was only admitted to his hospital because of a “vision of deity” only to find that his condition was totally unrelated to the vision and the symptoms only appeared within moments before he was unable to be saved and still stands ever more resolutely to the belief that there is no god? Gregory House.
People on television like this are flooding the streets with what seems to be a greater epidemic of stupid than we have ever had to suffer before. Just because they are gifted, talented, and intelligent, they know everything. They are never wrong and will fight to the death to defend themselves. Each of these different shows seem to profess that all people can make a claim and it is true.
The first time that this idea was brought to my attention was in high school. I went to a performing arts charter school where the academic standard was quite a bit higher than every other school in the area. The intelligence of the normal student was, to be fair, a bit better than those around us. I was on the lower end of the testing rates and I made it into a major, four-year university and have plans to get a doctorate in medicine. We learned concepts and beliefs that we may not have ever been able to obtain under any other circumstance. One of the greatest lessons learned through my six years (it was 7-12 grade) at that school was to question everything. We were not allowed to take anything for granted.
One of the best history professors I had at that school told us that we had to understand all of the circumstances surrounding the incident before we started shouting our beliefs or standing for something. If you are to understand the truth, you must know both sides of the story well enough to defend either one. Then you choose. If you never consider the other side, never really give the other side a chance; you will never know the truth. In short, you are useless if you can’t think outside of yourself.
It was after this class that I heard the phrase, “Man is a universe within himself”. Bob Marley did not say this to me directly. A girl who listened to Bob Marley did. She went on to explain that every man has their own truth; that truth is not absolute and that each mans experience teaches him the only truth that can be fully believed. She believed that no man can see outside of their own experience or grow beyond what they themselves have seen, heard, or felt. She told me that there was no absolute truth.
I beg to differ, but first, we will define our terms: Why? Because if we don’t you will never understand me and we cannot become anything greater than what we are right here, right now. Use my terms if you want to talk to me. Don’t give me new definitions. Use new words with new definitions if you must but when I say “truth” and “absolute truth” I expect that you will use the same definition.
SKIP SPECIFYING:
I like analogies. If you and I have a common feeling, understanding, or baseline, I can show you exactly what I mean. These sections (SKIP) are for those who want to understand a little better the way I see things. Feel free to respond with analogies of your own. If you just want to read my thoughts and you feel like you get what I’m trying to say, go to “_____ IS OVER” to keep going.
Absolute truth and truth are two different things as far as I’m concerned. The way the girl defined absolute truth is “that which everyone must accept to be true”. That seemed a bit squishy of a definition to me. I can say that an absolute truth is that the earth revolves around the sun. As much as I believe that to be true and I have plenty of empirical science to prove it, there are still people in modern day Rio de Janeiro who don’t believe it and don’t have to to survive or progress. The “must accept” part of it was the part that I couldn’t. For the definition of “absolute truth” I will use the following, “Absolute truth is that which is not decided upon nor believed in but exists regardless of belief or understanding”. I believe that we can know absolute truth, but not every absolute truth as long as we live. It would be folly to assume that we did.
Truth has been a word abused throughout the centuries which his why we need a distinction between truth and absolute truth. Absolute truth can come through experience or testing or even revelation, but we can’t say that it’s absolute truth without a perfect knower of all things telling us. I know that a lot of the readers here are rolling their eyes saying something akin to, “He’s getting spiritual on us” or “his definitions rely upon a god”. They don’t, actually. If you don’t believe in a god, according to scientific inquiry and the way in which most people define pure knowledge, a person cannot have absolute truth. You do not have every experience possible with a subject, substance, or circumstance so you cannot claim to have absolute truth unless you believe yourself to be the only being in existence. That’s called egocentrism with a touch of narcissism, though, and I won’t be going into that. Truth, as used in this document, will be defined as, “a belief in something obtained through searching and testing”.
Everyone has at least a general belief about everything. They don’t have truth about everything. I believe that the moon above this planet is incredibly far away, it’s cold and I would suffocate without a space suit. It’s true for me and I trust the people that have told me that. I believe that what they said was truth because they have tried and tested it. Is it absolute truth? I can’t tell you that because I haven’t been there and I don’t interact with the moon enough to know for absolute truth that that is exactly how it happened. We all believe in truth and hope that that truth is absolute truth.
As a side note, I’m probably going to use “believe” as: something you think is true and it has an effect on your actions.
THE SPECIFYING IS OVER
The girl who told me that “there is no such thing as Absolute truth” believed that the universes created by our different beliefs and experiences that floated around our heads were the only truths that there were. To tell someone else that something is “true” may simply be “true to you but not to me”. She has a point. How do you know that what you’re telling one person is necessarily true for everyone else? The answer is simple. I know most of you were expecting something like, “You can’t”, but I believe you can.
It takes a linguistic change. The problem is first found in how you tried to say that truth. Did you say, “sunshine is better than snow” or did you say something more like, “I think sunshine is better than snow”. One is true and the other is not. The first one makes a snow-lover think you are a pompous, ignorant sunshine-addict and the second makes the snow-lover ask why you have such a strong opinion. What’s the difference?
You have to understand that they may disagree. You have to be willing to let someone else believe that you are wrong. If you don’t you will never learn. Ever. To follow this analogy further, what happens to the sunshine-lover? The snow lover in the first occasion says, “Snow is better! Sunshine is hot and oppressive and people die of heatstroke and we need water and water comes from runoff from the mountains after snow!” How does Sunny respond? “Sunshine gives life and not everywhere in the world gets snow and everyone is just fine without it! People die of frostbite, it’s harder to drive, and you have to work really hard to stay warm if it’s cold!” They have to attack and defend.
ANALOGY
If I come at you with a knife trying to teach you that knives are dangerous, how well will you accept the lesson? Answer: Not well. You will probably pick up a chair and try to bludgeon me in the name of self-defense. Even if you don’t believe that my particular knife is not dangerous, you know well enough that if you are wrong, the consequences suck. You will use what you know to be right and attack me right back. The same happens in conversation. If I take out a hardboiled egg and put it on the counter and cut it, you could pick up a chair and crush the egg bits when I was done thus proving that your chair and my knife were both dangerous. The chair is probably more dangerous for the egg than my knife but the point was made and we can be satisfied with the results. We might even go on to a more exciting topic of just how much more dangerous a chair is than a knife, but, again, that’s a different discussion better left without me stabbing you our you breaking my ribs.
ANALOGY IS OVER
If you believe something to be true, say you believe it to be true. If you “know” something, tell me that you “know” it. If you tell me you “know” something is “true”, you had better be able to tell me why it’s true and how you know that it is. If I really want to know or my beliefs are very much in opposition to it, I had better be ready to tell you why I believe what I do and you had better be willing to listen. If we have a test or an experience we need to share or if there is anything we can do to prove one side over the other, an honest seeker of truth will do it. An honest person will shut up and do everything necessary to find out the truth, right or wrong. A liar will claim that the test is inconclusive because it isn’t what they thought before. A liar will fight in every way against change just to say that the test was inconclusive. When I was looking for ways to find out whether or not my friend cared about me, I asked another friend what they thought.
He gave me three tests to see if they were worth keeping as a friend. I told him my friend had been thoughtless and unkind two days prior having nothing to do whatsoever with the tests. He gave me an analogy I’ll never forget.
ANALOGY
If I want to practice writing Arabic script (as I have studied Arabic for a short time) I need a pen. If I have my paper on the table I want my pen to be there as well. There is no pen on the table. I go to my friend and say, “There is no pen.”
He says to me, “Why don’t you think there’s a pen?”
I say to him, “The pen is supposed to be on the table, so it can’t exist.”
He tells me, “There is a pen in the drawer.”
I can tell him, “But it’s not on the table” all I want. There’s still a pen and it still exists it’s just not on the table.
ANALOGY OVER
Long story short, my friend passed the test and I didn’t know he had just broken up with his girlfriend the day before the incident. Just because the answer wasn’t where I wanted it to be doesn’t make it change. It just means I have to stop assuming that every time I think something, it’s true. Better yet, just because I want it to be as such, doesn’t mean it’s absolute truth.
Why the essay on truth all of a sudden? Well, I keep meeting people over and over who think it their role on earth to teach me what I am doing wrong or why I’m incompetent. I talked to a girl for a while about my understanding of a subject for half-an-hour once trying to explain where my understanding of a certain moral came from. After trying for so long to help her see what I saw, the only thing she said was, “You know better.” Apparently, I don’t. I received instruction on how I was meant to perform a certain task and how I was meant to delegate the responsibilities including how I was supposed to handle a situation if the delegated work wasn’t done. I followed my instructions to the best of my abilities and was chastised for doing so. When I tried to defend myself later, I was met with hostility and reproach once again.
I have been taking flack from everyone for my choice of major and career. It’s one of the most commonly mocked sciences (when they let me call it a science at all) if not the most commonly mocked. This last week I have been approached by no less than twelve friends who have openly mocked my study and all but told me it was pointless, useless, and selfish to study something so imperfect. When I defended myself, I was told that my tests, proof, and desires were as pointless and falsified as my major itself.
As television, movies, and most popular culture items have screamed since many of Freud’s original underlings were found to be frauds, psychology is rarely considered a real field of study. The results are imperfect, the popular culture has defined its growth rate, and most “intellects” hate the idea that there is a science that openly claims that it isn’t finished. The important part of that statement is “openly claims”.
For the idiot “intellects” in this world that hate psychology, please, tell me how gravity works? Don’t describe it to me. I want you to tell me how gravity works. In order for me to believe in physics the same way you need to believe in psychology, show me what attracts atoms to density? On a related note, I need someone to describe electric and magnetic charge. In order for me to believe that charge exists, I need to know why electrons move the way they do in a positively charged field. Show me the interactions that they have and tell me why they work the way they do and I will accept electrical engineering as a science. You can show me that it works, but if you can’t show me how, it works, I’m afraid you fall in the same trap you set for psychology.
Physics is an incredibly imperfect science, but the only reason why nobody questions it is that we have been dealing with it for centuries. Popular culture burned men and women at the stake for claiming that the earth revolved around the sun. We are doing basically the same thing to psychology and any other science in its infancy. We know that psychology can work. We know that all men and women work on the same general set of rules. Now that we have finally started searching for the absolute truth of the difference between the mind and the brain, imperfection is suddenly not only undesirable, it’s the butt of every scientific joke, the redheaded step-child of the academic world, and the heretic of all that is “absolute truth”.
I’m tired of people telling me that my science is any less than any other. We study, we research, we have findings, and we have proof. Psychology is not just mind reading. Psychology is not just what you think and why. Psychology includes what happens to your body when you get mad, why your blood pressure rises when you become stressed, and why, in every culture ever studied, the same muscles move in your face when surprised or truly happy or guilty.
Psychology is trying to understand what everyone has been telling us for years “just is”. We know so much more now than ever before due to psychology: things we never thought we would believe. Distance does not make the heart grow fonder. Sexy meant “healthy” back in the day. At a certain point, the more choices we have, the less popular the restaurant.
Before you decide to tell me what you believe to be truth, let me know how much you think you know. Tell me how much time you have put into finding out why I believe what I do. The next time Dr. Brennan says that we have biologically evolved into the desires we have. Find out what science lies at the bottom of those desires. I think that anthropology is just a covert name for “macro-psychology”.
